Good to know, I use Ubuntu/Debian so I will check for that.

Sorry, ignore me. I got this figured out. I was being really dumb and had the wrong config.json file open and didn't know what I was looking at. Just ignore. Yes, the socket.io settings were missing, but were on my screen so I was sure that they were there.

@scottalanmiller and all, I don't know why you still loosing time. Use my rpms and install freeswitch/fusionpbx in minutes
https://okay.network/blog-news/rpm-repositories-for-centos-6-and-7.html

@jnaugle also worth noting, no one actually delivers PRI today, that entire market is a scam. It's actually SIP and then they translate the SIP to PRI on your network edge to make it "sound cool" for people who are out of date and remember when PRI was both still available and actually practical (early 1990s and earlier.) PRI is not nearly as powerful as SIP, nor as cheap, so phone providers long ago "all" moved to providing SIP instead (PRI isn't possible without a physical T1) and "virtualizing" PRI on top of it. All the PRI does it increase cost and lower performance, flexibility and reliability.

So the best solution is to get the phone provider to stop pretending to do PRI and just give you the raw SIP. This improves your phone quality by removing unnecessary steps and limitations, removes the need for you to convert back to SIP (gateway, card, however you do it) and makes everything better for everyone. The PRI interface has no advantages, only disadvantages. It takes the better SIP, and cripples it.

For people running ancient phone systems from before VoIP, SIP isn't possible, so these terrible PRI interfaces are useful for them to continue to be able to hook up those ancient phone systems while still being able to connect to current phone companies. They aren't totally useless, but they are useful only for that one terrible niche case.

@iroal said in Guacamole 0.9.14 on CentOS 7:

@jackmartins_ said in Guacamole 0.9.14 on CentOS 7:

@iroal Did you solve this problem? I got the same error

I reinstall using this tutorial.

https://cstan.io/?p=11405&lang=en

Regards.

Those instructions is pretty good. He did leave out information about the default user and password for it.

@scottalanmiller Did you ever fix this?

@obsolesce it ran this afternoon. I noted that.

@jaredbusch said in Someone tell me WTF is wrong with my rync skills this morning:

tired or stupid or something this morning..

works perfectly when one specifies the correct data directory on the source.

/home/owncloud/data/

sent 1764471 bytes received 178175 bytes 56308.58 bytes/sec total size is 148236697158 speedup is 76306.59 (DRY RUN)

I hate that. You always have a few outliers before you standardize on things and they are always the gotchas. This has happened to me on many occasions.

@black3dynamite said in Setup Zimbra 8.8.6 on CentOS 7:

If I were to set this up at home behind a Comcast gateway modem, I would need to setup MTA to do HostLookup Native?

And to clarify, that is if you don't want to do split DNS.

@black3dynamite It's there, but I'm still getting the above error

@black3dynamite said in Nextcloud 12/CentOS 7 -- Problem with code integrity check:

@emad-r said in Nextcloud 12/CentOS 7 -- Problem with code integrity check:

@black3dynamite
I ll try my best to answer:

You can have either but not both, PHP as Apache HTTPD module or PHP as FPM, If you want to setup PHP-FPM on centos instead of PHP module or mod_php, and then PHP-FPM starts as an systemctl service, you will need to carry on those steps:

Install Apache:

yum -y install httpd systemctl enable httpd systemctl start httpd

Install PHP-FPM:

yum -y install php yum -y install php-fpm

Configure Apache httpd:

nano /etc/httpd/conf.d/php.conf <FilesMatch \.php$> # SetHandler application/x-httpd-php SetHandler "proxy:fcgi://127.0.0.1:9000" </FilesMatch>

Then:

systemctl start php-fpm systemctl enable php-fpm systemctl restart httpd

For me if I want to make any web app, I just simply go this route, back in the day I would make it faster by running Nginx, but most third party web apps expect apache, and I found out the by simply using PHP-FPM with Apache I can make the web app as responsive and fast as ever, and I never found scenario where that is not compatible, what you simply do is remove PHP being child of apache, and giving it daemon of its own with children, and it becomes very fast.

The setup on CentOS is different compare to Fedora 27.

Installing php also installs php-fpm.

[root@localhost hjohnson]# dnf install php Last metadata expiration check: 2:30:05 ago on Wed 07 Feb 2018 08:46:00 AM MST. Dependencies resolved. ============================================================================================================================================================================================================ Package Arch Version Repository Size ============================================================================================================================================================================================================ Installing: php x86_64 7.1.14-1.fc27 updates 2.8 M Installing dependencies: nginx-filesystem noarch 1:1.12.1-1.fc27 fedora 20 k php-cli x86_64 7.1.14-1.fc27 updates 4.2 M php-common x86_64 7.1.14-1.fc27 updates 1.0 M php-json x86_64 7.1.14-1.fc27 updates 72 k Installing weak dependencies: php-fpm x86_64 7.1.14-1.fc27 updates 1.5 M

And its already configured /etc/httpd/conf.d/php.conf

# Redirect to local php-fpm if mod_php is not available <IfModule !mod_php5.c> <IfModule !mod_php7.c> # Enable http authorization headers SetEnvIfNoCase ^Authorization$ "(.+)" HTTP_AUTHORIZATION=$1 <FilesMatch \.(php|phar)$> SetHandler "proxy:unix:/run/php-fpm/www.sock|fcgi://localhost" </FilesMatch> </IfModule> </IfModule>

Yup I noticed this with Fedora, and when I jump to Fedora , or when Centos gets updated to reach Fedora levels like in 3-5 years I will worry about that. I never reached scenario where I needed bleeding edge server, and if that is the case usually it is Ubuntu and not Fedora.

And, success.

/whew

0_1517889371000_1dfe16bb-bb0e-4fd1-842e-1cf615b8af6b-image.png

@zachary715
You can turn on debug by changing false to true in .env file, so you can see more information instead of Whoops, looks like something went wrong.

# REQUIRED: BASIC APP SETTINGS # -------------------------------------------- APP_ENV=production APP_DEBUG=true APP_KEY= APP_URL= APP_TIMEZONE=America/Denver APP_LOCALE=en

Just tried it, and yes, missing integration services.

Long story short: I'll stick with Ubuntu 😉 Yeah, I know, I could easily install them, but I'm more in the Debian corner anyway.

@lakshmana said in Centos 7.3 Wifi Issue:

@scottalanmiller said in Centos 7.3 Wifi Issue:

@lakshmana said in Centos 7.3 Wifi Issue:

@scottalanmiller Installed Ubuntu now

But OLD Ubuntu, that is expected to have lots of issues because it is not up to date, right?

Yes Now WiFi Detected will go with KVM and then Centos will run it

Great!

@scottalanmiller Thanks Scott it worked

@stacksofplates said in Centos 7.3 Installed:

@lakshmana said in Centos 7.3 Installed:

@scottalanmiller said in Centos 7.3 Installed:

@stacksofplates said in Centos 7.3 Installed:

@lakshmana said in Centos 7.3 Installed:

@stacksofplates for acpi "command not found" is the error

You'll have to install it.

yum install acpi

The package has one more letter in the name. Should be this...

yum install acpid

Then you can fire it up like this...

systemctl start acpid systemctl enable acpid

Installation done but error comes
[root@localhost ~]# sysctl start acpid
sysctl: cannot stat /proc/sys/start: No such file or directory
sysctl: cannot stat /proc/sys/acpid: No such file or directory
[root@localhost ~]# sysctl enable acpid
sysctl: cannot stat /proc/sys/enable: No such file or directory
sysctl: cannot stat /proc/sys/acpid: No such file or directory
[root@localhost ~]#

It's systemctl not sysctl. Two different things.

Thanks

@mikah67 Glad that it is working!

As a general rule, just do a yum -y update before starting an installation to make sure you are fully updated, regardless of which CentOS 7 version you started with.

@dashrender said in Self-Imposed Nextcloud Limitations:

@brrabill said in Self-Imposed Nextcloud Limitations:

@wirestyle22 said

More insurance than security. If everything goes to hell I told Laura to poison me without my knowledge

I can come run you over with my car. I work close enough.

Or maybe your car. No offense, I like my car.

Oh man.. If Wired gets mowed down.. I'm afraid Brrabill is going to jail.

We're friends. <--this post disproves he has any ill will